Outsourcing Your Site Migration in 2026? Ask These Questions to Make Sure Digital Marketing Isn’t an Afterthought

in Blog  by Ann

Outsourcing a website migration to a development agency has never been more common, or more dangerous.

These days, most site migrations aren’t just design refreshes. They’re often tied to replatforming, CMS changes, headless builds, performance initiatives, accessibility requirements, AI-driven content workflows, new analytics stacks, all that jazz. And the more you’re trying to change, the more room for error there is. 

And while the nature of site migrations may have shifted over the years, I continue to see clients fall into the same old trap I’ve been seeing for over a decade:

The fastest way to hurt marketing performance? Treat a migration like it’s only about the website.

We see this constantly. But the fact is a site migration isn’t just a web project, it’s a marketing moment whether you plan for it or not. Time and time again we’ve watched clients outsource a migration to a development agency that promises speed, flexibility, and cost savings. Then they launch with broken tracking, lost rankings, slower performance, and end up with months of cleanup work that costs more than doing it right the first time.

The part that hurts the most is that you don’t need to be a developer or SEO expert to avoid this. You don’t even need to hire an agency like us (which is why I’m not in sales).

You just need to ask the right questions. 

So let the ghosts of clients’ past inform your migration future. If you’re thinking about a site migration in 2026, here’s the fine print about marketing you should not skip over. Below are the questions we, a digital marketing agency, recommend asking before you sign anything.

Questions to Avoid A Performance Nightmare

A lot of budget-friendly agencies utilize drag-and-drop builders like Elementor, Divi, or off-the-shelf ThemeForest themes. These tools are simple to use and they look great visually, but they often come inextricably linked with issues like bloated HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, excessive DOM depth, failing Core Web Vitals metrics, and fragile templates that break after launch. 

If there’s no experienced developer cleaning up behind the scenes, you end up with a site that looks exactly the way you want… but is quietly destroying SEO, paid media efficiency, and conversion rates. 

To put it a different way, it’s like if you’re replacing the floor in your living room. After two weeks of construction, your contractor shows you the beautiful new floor that looks just like you imagined. And on they’re way out the door says, “by the way, this thing can’t support more than 200 lbs at a time.” 

You may think avoiding things like slow performance, bloated code, and a floor that supports more than 200 lbs is assumed, but it’s not. That’s why these agencies are so affordable.

Before you find yourself falling through the floor, ask these two questions:

1. “Can you show us a clean code sample or GitHub repo from a recent site migration?”

The fact is that good-faith agencies that build production-ready websites should be able to show:

  • Component examples
  • Template structures
  • Coding standards
  • Or a repo illustrating how they handle layout, performance, and accessibility

Shady agencies won’t show you the back end of anything, and will say things like:

  • “We don’t provide access to code.”
  • “Our sites are proprietary.”
  • “We rely on premium builders for flexibility.”

Those responses usually mean shortcuts and future marketing pain.

2. “How do you optimize and prioritize performance during a migration?”

This question is especially powerful. Fun fact: page builders cannot remove unused code. So if the agency doesn’t already have a real strategy here, performance issues are going to be baked in from day one. 

You’re going to want to hear your agency say things like:

  • “We purge unused CSS and JavaScript for each template.”
  • “We limit DOM nodes and avoid unnecessary nesting.”
  • “We use semantic HTML instead of builder-generated markup.”
  • “We test Core Web Vitals throughout development — not just after launch.”

Agencies that don’t have plan for digital performance will avoid saying anything to do with structural bloat, and will speak to surface level fixes such as:

  • “We use caching plugins.”
  • “We compress images.”
  • “We install WP Rocket.”

Questions to Avoid A Digital Marketing Meltdown

A hard truth that I’ve had the misfortune of seeing in action multiple times is this: site migration that ignores SEO, analytics, and attribution can erase months (or years) of marketing progress overnight.

3. “How do you ensure SEO fundamentals are preserved during the migration?”

You’re looking for answers that specifically address the following:

  • URL continuity and pre and post crawls
  • Template parity (headings, metadata, schema)
  • Internal linking and navigation changes
  • Validating redirects

If they don’t mention the above, they’ll likely parry your question by saying: 

  • “SEO is addressed after launch”
  • “We have a different team that handles SEO” (in which case, make sure you talk to this “different team” before proceeding)
  • They’ll name-drop an SEO plugin like Yoast but not go into detail

4. “How do you handle GA4, GTM, and conversion tracking before launch?”

This is where many a migrations quietly fail. These items are essential to your digital marketing performance and a good dev agency will have a data/analytics person who can speak to the below:

  • “We validate GA4 events across all templates.”
  • “We QA GTM containers between staging and production.”
  • “We test conversion funnels end-to-end before launch.”

Look out for answers that deflect, such as: 

  • “We’ll add GA4 right before go-live.”
  • “You can rebuild conversions after launch.”
  • “Basic tracking should be fine for now.”

One Question That Protects Your Future

5. “If we ever migrate again, will the code you produce transfer cleanly?”

This question exposes agency incentives.

Builder-heavy agencies often produce sites that are:

  • Plugin-dependent
  • Proprietary
  • Difficult or impossible to migrate
  • Designed to keep you locked in

Green-flag answers:

  • “Yes — it’s clean, portable HTML/CSS/JS.”
  • “We build with platform flexibility in mind.”
  • “Nothing prevents future migrations.”

Red-flag answers:

  • “Migration isn’t recommended.”
  • “You’ll need to keep using our tools.”
  • “The site depends on our builders.”

That’s not partnership — it’s dependency.

Final Takeaway: In 2026, Migrations Are Marketing Events

A site migration isn’t just a development milestone.
It’s a digital marketing inflection point.

If your agency isn’t thinking about SEO, performance, analytics, and future flexibility during the build, you’ll pay for it later; in traffic loss, broken reporting, and emergency fixes.

If you want help evaluating migration risk before outsourcing, or need a framework to align your internal teams, we’ve created two resources to help:

👉 The Site Migration Risk Framework and Site Migration Prevention Guide

They’re designed to help marketing, SEO, engineering, and analytics teams ask the right questions before performance is on the line.

Because in 2026, the most expensive site migration mistake isn’t spending too much; it’s outsourcing without protecting your digital marketing foundation.